Background Image
如何赢得愁云使者与疾风剑豪的对抗赛愁云使者 is in the b tier of champions

愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪

如何在LoL中以愁云使者的身份击败疾风剑豪愁云使者 is in the s tier of champions
Mage
FighterAssassin

如何击败疾风剑豪成为愁云使者

based on 6,053 愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 matchups
胜率
48.8 %
kda
2.47
受欢迎度
8.2 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

We at MOBA Champion analyze millions of recently ranked LoL rounds each and every week. In our data, 愁云使者 fought 疾风剑豪 6053 times. With so many matchups for 愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 gives us a lot of faith in our capability to produce enlightening stats and a pro build to shatter 疾风剑豪. This counter pairing is somewhat uncommon. 愁云使者 has to counter 疾风剑豪 in only 8.2% of their matches.

愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 Matchup Summary

Unfortunately, 愁云使者 does a dismal job of beating 疾风剑豪. Normally, they wins a acceptable 48.8% of matches the champions oppose each other in. In 愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 rounds, 愁云使者’s side is 0.0% more likely to get first blood, indicating that they probably will be able to get first blood against 疾风剑豪.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
多兰之戒生命药水

下一个项目

5分钟
鞋子遗失的章节

Core 愁云使者 Items

22分钟
灭世者的死亡之帽中娅沙漏风暴狂涌

可选项目

影焰残疫虚空之杖兰德里的折磨

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerdot summoner spell F

技能顺序

为愁云使者提升等级的第一个技能q
>
为愁云使者提供的第二种能力,以提高水平w
>
愁云使者 最大化的最后一项技能e

符文

主宰黑暗收割血之滋味眼球收集器终极猎人
巫术法力流系带超然
Attack SpeedAdaptive ForceArmor
愁云使者's passive ability p
愁云使者's q ability q
愁云使者's w ability w
愁云使者's e ability e
愁云使者's ultimate ability r
1
E
2
Q
3
W
4
Q
5
Q
6
R
7
Q
8
W
9
Q
10
W
11
R
12
W
13
W
14
E
15
E
16
R

Guide to Countering 疾风剑豪 as 愁云使者

Advice to Win Against 疾风剑豪

- 亚索的百折不屈的护盾只持续2秒。对他造成伤害即可将护盾触发。先等护盾消失,然后再开战。

- 斩钢闪的范围非常狭窄。尽可能靠边,就能躲过这招。

- 亚索在发出旋风之后最为虚弱,可以趁机逼他交战。

- 当亚索的斩钢闪连续命中两次时,他的下次斩钢闪就会形成一道旋风。要观察他的增益栏,并且留心聆听相关音效,做好躲避这招的准备。

愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 Counter Stats

愁云使者 Image
winRate
48.8 %
VS
winRate
51.2 %
疾风剑豪 Image
7
< kills >
6.8
6
< deaths >
7
7.8
< assists >
5.3
1.64
< killingSprees >
1.55
157
< cs >
181
0.05
< dragons >
0.19
0.42
< inhibitors >
0.51
1,450
< physicalDamage >
17,158
20,241
< magicDamage >
1,811
895
< trueDamage >
900
22,588
< damageDealt >
19,870
18,614
< damageTaken >
24,432
11,228
< goldEarned >
12,360
1.79
< towers >
2.26
0.02
< barons >
0.05
2,142
< heal >
5,481
14,066
< xp >
14,275
18
< visionScore >
17
9
< wardsPlaced >
8
553
< ccTime >
192

How to Counter 疾风剑豪 with 愁云使者 in LoL

The stats provided here feature several influential 愁云使者 vs. 疾风剑豪 counter statistics that may help you interpret the differences and similarities between the pair. As an example, 愁云使者’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is better than 疾风剑豪’s ratio of NaN, showing that 愁云使者 may be more central to their team's team fighting capability than 疾风剑豪..

愁云使者 usually has a similar longest killing spree as their opponent does. Commonly, they receives less damage than 疾风剑豪. This is usually reflective of different amounts of tankyness, yet it can also imply that the one champ has less mobility and thus is unable to kite away from further damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

愁云使者
疾风剑豪
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

愁云使者
疾风剑豪

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both League champions are great. Both champs have their pros and cons. In the game's current meta, 愁云使者 usually loses when trying to fight 疾风剑豪, with a 48.8% win rate. Thus, 愁云使者 makes a bad counter to 疾风剑豪.

While 愁云使者 does have a lower winrate than 疾风剑豪, when on opposite teams, 愁云使者 also has a much lower learning curve that makes them a less complex champ to develop with. You should be careful when picking 愁云使者 into 疾风剑豪.

Moreover, 愁云使者 has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 疾风剑豪. This often makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when trying to counter champions with a lot of burst damage.

While there isn't a single best champion overall in League of Legends, in 愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 matchups, 疾风剑豪 is the better champion with a lower win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allied champions during team fights.

愁云使者 is a somewhat poor counter for 疾风剑豪. Focus your tactics on increasing your gold income and clearing objectives. If you do that, you should be able to stand on your own as 愁云使者 against 疾风剑豪.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

If you would like to truly master 愁云使者 in order to counter 疾风剑豪 during both the early game and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to learn a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you listen to the build and tips displayed here, you should grow your win rate significantly and be closer to League of Legends pro players.

愁云使者 on average accumulates a similar amount of CS as 疾风剑豪. Champions who on average don't earn many minion kills often don't need much CS to be effective, such as support champions. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling well off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champs with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, usually need many items to be effective. In either case, try to exceed the values displayed on this page to do well.

The best items to prioritize in your 愁云使者 versus 疾风剑豪 build consist of 灭世者的死亡之帽, 中娅沙漏, and 风暴狂涌. When 愁云使者 included at least these three pieces in their build, they did a lot better vs 疾风剑豪 than with most other commonly used item sets. In fact, 愁云使者 had an average winrate of 48.8% when playing against 疾风剑豪 with these items in their kit.

To have the best probability of crushing 疾风剑豪 as 愁云使者, 愁云使者 players should equip the 黑暗收割, 血之滋味, 眼球收集器, 终极猎人, 法力流系带, and 超然 runes from the 主宰 and 巫术 rune sets. Of all the rune combinations players picked for 愁云使者 vs 疾风剑豪 clashes, this set of runes yielded the best win rate. In fact, these runes gave a 48.8% winrate overall.

If you want to see 愁云使者 versus 疾风剑豪 tips and matchup stats and build suggestions for a a particular player tier, please choose one from the selection menu provided above. If viewing for the first time, the statistics and build suggestions displayed are calculated using every round with data with both champs.