Background Image
如何赢得迅捷斥候与时光守护者的对抗赛迅捷斥候 is in the a tier of champions

迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者

如何在LoL中以迅捷斥候的身份击败时光守护者迅捷斥候 is in the s tier of champions
MarksmanAssassin
SupportMage

如何击败时光守护者成为迅捷斥候

based on 3,370 迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者 matchups
胜率
52.7 %
kda
1.82
受欢迎度
1.1 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

We get our matchup stats from the millions of rated League of Legends matches that we get from Riot Games each week. Our guide on how to beat 时光守护者 as 迅捷斥候 came out of an evaluation of 3370 ranked games where both champions opposed each other. This particular pairing is somewhat rare. 迅捷斥候 is forced to battle against 时光守护者 in only 1.1% of his matches.

迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者 Matchup Summary

迅捷斥候 has done a good job of countering 时光守护者. Typically, he wins a whopping 52.7% of matches the champions battle each other in. In 迅捷斥候 against 时光守护者 games, 迅捷斥候’s side is 0.0% more expected to get first blood, indicating that he probably will get first blood versus 时光守护者.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
生命药水云游图鉴

下一个项目

5分钟
鞋子爆裂魔杖

Core 迅捷斥候 Items

22分钟
灭世者的死亡之帽纳什之牙残疫

可选项目

影焰风暴狂涌扎兹沙克的溃口兰德里的折磨

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerteleport summoner spell F

技能顺序

为迅捷斥候提升等级的第一个技能q
>
为迅捷斥候提供的第二种能力,以提高水平e
>
迅捷斥候 最大化的最后一项技能w

符文

主宰黑暗收割恶意中伤眼球收集器终极猎人
巫术超然风暴聚集
Adaptive ForceAdaptive ForceArmor
迅捷斥候's passive ability p
迅捷斥候's q ability q
迅捷斥候's w ability w
迅捷斥候's e ability e
迅捷斥候's ultimate ability r
1
Q
2
E
3
W
4
Q
5
Q
6
R
7
Q
8
E
9
Q
10
E
11
R
12
E
13
E
14
W
15
W
16
R

Guide to Countering 时光守护者 as 迅捷斥候

Tips for Playing as 迅捷斥候 against 时光守护者

- 提莫的蘑菇用来打钱是很有效的。

- 将你的蘑菇放在地图上的关键位置,比如靠近龙或纳什男爵的地方,以便在敌人试图杀死他们的时候能侦查到。

Advice to Win Against 时光守护者

- 基兰很容易死在集火之下,但是很难被单杀。想杀他时,请你的队伍集中火力。

- 如果你能跟上基兰的速度,你可以等到他的终极技能效果消逝之后,再发出夺命一击。

迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者 Counter Stats

迅捷斥候 Image
winRate
52.7 %
VS
winRate
47.3 %
时光守护者 Image
5.2
< kills >
2.7
6.5
< deaths >
5.2
6.6
< assists >
12.9
1.19
< killingSprees >
0.56
134
< cs >
65
0.22
< dragons >
0.04
0.49
< inhibitors >
0.48
2,667
< physicalDamage >
997
23,757
< magicDamage >
10,646
1,789
< trueDamage >
749
28,214
< damageDealt >
12,393
22,190
< damageTaken >
20,852
11,419
< goldEarned >
9,349
1.96
< towers >
1.81
0.06
< barons >
0.01
3,198
< heal >
7,880
14,539
< xp >
12,664
28
< visionScore >
52
11
< wardsPlaced >
23
512
< ccTime >
183

How to Counter 时光守护者 with 迅捷斥候 in LoL

The stats shown on this page feature some strategic 迅捷斥候 versus 时光守护者 counter stats that may help us figure out the differences and similarities between this pair of champions. 迅捷斥候’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is greater than 时光守护者’s ratio of NaN, indicating that 迅捷斥候 may be more central to his team's team fighting capacity than 时光守护者..

迅捷斥候 often has a slightly larger longest kill spree than his matchup does. On average, he receives a similar amount of damage to 时光守护者. This is usually reflective of differing health capacities, but it can also indicate that the one champ has less mobility and thus is not able to kite away from additional damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

迅捷斥候
时光守护者
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

迅捷斥候
时光守护者

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both League champions are great. Both have their pros and cons. In League's current meta, 迅捷斥候 usually wins when facing off against 时光守护者, with a 52.7% win rate. Therefore, 迅捷斥候 makes a good counter to 时光守护者.

While 迅捷斥候 does have a higher win rate compared to 时光守护者, when on opposite teams, 迅捷斥候 also has a greater learning curve that makes him a more challenging champion to learn. You don't need to be too worried when picking 迅捷斥候 into 时光守护者.

Additionally, 迅捷斥候 has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 时光守护者. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when trying to counter champions with a ton of burst damage.

While there is not one best champion in League of Legends, in 迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者 matchups, 迅捷斥候 is the better champion with a noticably higher win rate, similar champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allied champions during late stage team fights.

迅捷斥候 is an above average counter to 时光守护者. Focus your actions on increasing your gold and cs and destroying objectives. If you can do that, you should hold your own as 迅捷斥候 against 时光守护者.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

If you would like to truly master 迅捷斥候 to counter 时光守护者 during both the early game and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to pick up a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you pay attention to the build and stats presented above, you will increase your win rate significantly and be that much closer to League of Legends pro players.

迅捷斥候 often picks up more CS compared to 时光守护者. Champions who on average don't take much CS usualy don't need much CS to be valuable teammates, such as supports. They are capable of scaling well off of their abilities and first items alone. Yet, champions with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, often require a lot of items to be effective. In either case, try to exceed the values displayed here to do well.

The most crucial items to focus on in your 迅捷斥候 versus 时光守护者 build consist of 灭世者的死亡之帽, 纳什之牙, and 残疫. When 迅捷斥候 bought at least these three pieces in his build, he performed significantly better versus 时光守护者 than with most other typical counter builds. In fact, 迅捷斥候 boasted an average winrate of 52.7% battling 时光守护者 with this build.

To have the greatest chance of beating 时光守护者 as 迅捷斥候, you should take the 黑暗收割, 恶意中伤, 眼球收集器, 终极猎人, 风暴聚集, and 超然 runes from the 主宰 and 巫术 rune sets. Out of all the rune builds that we analyzed for 迅捷斥候 vs 时光守护者 matchups, this composite of runes resulted in the greatest win rate. Notably, these runes averaged a 52.7% win rate overall.

If you need to get 迅捷斥候 versus 时光守护者 tips and matchup stats and build suggestions for a a distinct division rank, please select one from the selection menu provided above. At first, the stats and guides displayed are computed using all rounds with data with both champs.