Background Image
如何赢得荒漠屠夫与不羁之悦的对抗赛荒漠屠夫 is in the b tier of champions

荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦

如何在LoL中以荒漠屠夫的身份击败不羁之悦荒漠屠夫 is in the s tier of champions
FighterTank
FighterAssassin

如何击败不羁之悦成为荒漠屠夫

based on 965 荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 matchups
胜率
47.7 %
kda
1.89
受欢迎度
1.6 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

At MOBA Champion, we evaluate millions of recently ranked LoL games each week. Within our data, 荒漠屠夫 faced 不羁之悦 965 times. Using so many games with 荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 gives us a lot of confidence in our ability to produce actionable stats and a pro build to counter your rival. This particular counter matchup is relatively rare. 荒漠屠夫 has to counter 不羁之悦 in only 1.6% of his games.

荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 Matchup Summary

Unfortunately, 荒漠屠夫 does a poor job of countering 不羁之悦. Normally, he wins a lowly 47.7% of matches the champions fight each other in. In 荒漠屠夫 against 不羁之悦 games, 荒漠屠夫’s team is 0.0% more probable to obtain first blood. This implies that he most likely will be able to get first blood against 不羁之悦.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
多兰之刃生命药水

下一个项目

5分钟
长剑考尔菲德的战锤

Core 荒漠屠夫 Items

22分钟
斯特拉克的挑战护手朔极之矛焚天

可选项目

星蚀黑色切割者破败王者之刃海克斯注力刚壁

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerteleport summoner spell F

技能顺序

为荒漠屠夫提升等级的第一个技能q
>
为荒漠屠夫提供的第二种能力,以提高水平e
>
荒漠屠夫 最大化的最后一项技能w

符文

精密征服者凯旋传说:欢欣坚毅不倒
坚决骸骨镀层坚定
Attack SpeedAdaptive ForceArmor
荒漠屠夫's passive ability p
荒漠屠夫's q ability q
荒漠屠夫's w ability w
荒漠屠夫's e ability e
荒漠屠夫's ultimate ability r
1
Q
2
W
3
E
4
Q
5
Q
6
R
7
Q
8
E
9
Q
10
E
11
R
12
E
13
E
14
W
15
W
16
R

Guide to Countering 不羁之悦 as 荒漠屠夫

Tips for Playing as 荒漠屠夫 against 不羁之悦

- 狂怒状态下巨鳄狂袭可以汲取额外的生命值,你可以借此让敌人错误的低估你。

- 横冲直撞非常适合骚扰。先释放技能突入,触发后使用直撞返回安全的位置。

- 冷却缩减对雷克顿来说是不错的属性,可以迅速获得并使用怒气。

荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 Counter Stats

荒漠屠夫 Image
winRate
47.7 %
VS
winRate
52.3 %
不羁之悦 Image
5.6
< kills >
7.7
5.7
< deaths >
6.5
5.2
< assists >
5.9
1.24
< killingSprees >
1.74
178
< cs >
168
0.06
< dragons >
0.18
0.42
< inhibitors >
0.54
16,185
< physicalDamage >
18,195
3,142
< magicDamage >
169
710
< trueDamage >
411
20,038
< damageDealt >
18,775
34,302
< damageTaken >
23,376
11,439
< goldEarned >
12,473
2.24
< towers >
2.51
0.02
< barons >
0.05
10,145
< heal >
8,338
14,418
< xp >
12,930
16
< visionScore >
16
8
< wardsPlaced >
8
63
< ccTime >
85

How to Counter 不羁之悦 with 荒漠屠夫 in LoL

The stats shown on this page underscore some strategic 荒漠屠夫 versus 不羁之悦 counter statistics that may help us interpret the distinctions between the two. As an example, 荒漠屠夫’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is better than 不羁之悦’s KDA ratio of NaN, indicating that 荒漠屠夫 may be more central to his team's team fighting capacity than 不羁之悦..

荒漠屠夫 usually has a slightly smaller longest killing spree than his enemy does. Typically, he receives more damage than 不羁之悦. This typically indicates different amounts of tankyness; however, it can also imply that the champion with more health has less mobility and thus is not able to escape further damage when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

荒漠屠夫
不羁之悦
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

荒漠屠夫
不羁之悦

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both LoL champions are great. Both champs have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In League's current meta, 荒漠屠夫 usually loses when facing off against 不羁之悦, with a 47.7% win rate. Therefore, 荒漠屠夫 makes a poor counter to 不羁之悦.

While 荒漠屠夫 does have a lower win rate than 不羁之悦, when they face off with one another, 荒漠屠夫 also has a much lower level of difficulty that makes him a less difficult character to learn and master. You should expect to face a difficult match when picking 荒漠屠夫 into 不羁之悦.

Moreover, 荒漠屠夫 has only a small amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to 不羁之悦. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when facing champions with a lot of burst damage.

While there isn't a single best champion overall in League of Legends, in 荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 matchups, 不羁之悦 is the better champion with a lower win rate, less champion complexity, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allied champions during teamfights.

荒漠屠夫 is a garbage counter for 不羁之悦. You will do well by focussing your strategy on increasing your CS and clearing objectives. If you can do that, you should hold your own as 荒漠屠夫 against 不羁之悦.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

To learn all of the intricacies of 荒漠屠夫 in order to counter 不羁之悦 during both the lane and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to pick up a few extra tips and tricks for this matchup. If you mind the build and suggestions shown here, you will grow your win rate by a lot and be that much closer to League of Legends pro players.

荒漠屠夫 typically accumulates a similar amount of CS relative to 不羁之悦. Champs who on average don't acquire much CS usualy don't have to have much CS to be effective, such as support champions. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling properly off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champions with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically require several high cost items to be effective. In either case, try to do better than the numbers displayed here to do well.

The most crucial items to have in your 荒漠屠夫 versus 不羁之悦 build include 斯特拉克的挑战护手, 朔极之矛, and 焚天. When 荒漠屠夫 combined at least these three pieces in his build, he did a lot better vs 不羁之悦 than with many other common counter builds. In fact, 荒漠屠夫 had an average winrate of 47.7% when countering 不羁之悦 with this build.

To have the best probability of crushing 不羁之悦 as 荒漠屠夫, you should equip the 征服者, 凯旋, 传说:欢欣, 坚毅不倒, 骸骨镀层, and 坚定 runes from the 精密 and 坚决 rune sets. Of all the rune combinations players used for 荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 clashes, this sequence of runes resulted in the best win rate. Notably, these runes averaged a 47.7% win rate overall.

If you want to get 荒漠屠夫 vs 不羁之悦 tips and builds for a a distinct division rank, feel free to select one from the selection menu above. If viewing for the first time, the stats and strategies displayed are calculated using every match completed with both champs.