Background Image
如何赢得深海泰坦与时光守护者的对抗赛深海泰坦 is in the a tier of champions

深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者

如何在LoL中以深海泰坦的身份击败时光守护者深海泰坦 is in the s tier of champions
TankSupport
SupportMage

如何击败时光守护者成为深海泰坦

based on 1,749 深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者 matchups
胜率
47.3 %
kda
2.35
受欢迎度
1.1 %

How We Analyze LoL Champion Counters

We at MOBA Champion evaluate millions of recently ranked LoL rounds each and every week. In our database, 深海泰坦 did battle with 时光守护者 1749 times. With so many games with 深海泰坦 versus 时光守护者 provides us faith in our capability to produce actionable stats and a solid build to counter your opposition. This matchup is fairly rare. 深海泰坦 encounters 时光守护者 in only 1.1% of his rounds.

深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者 Matchup Summary

Unfortunately, 深海泰坦 does a dismal job of countering 时光守护者. On average, he wins a lowly 47.3% of games the champs face one another in. In 深海泰坦 versus 时光守护者 matches, 深海泰坦’s team is 0.3% more expected to gain first blood, implying that he probably will be able to get first blood versus 时光守护者.

counterTitle

物品

第一项

期望时间
生命药水云游图鉴

下一个项目

5分钟
鞋子燃烧宝石

Core 深海泰坦 Items

22分钟
基克的聚合钢铁烈阳之匣星界据守

可选项目

骑士之誓冰霜之心荆棘之甲引路者

Summoner Spells

summonerflash summoner spell D
summonerdot summoner spell F

技能顺序

为深海泰坦提升等级的第一个技能q
>
为深海泰坦提供的第二种能力,以提高水平w
>
深海泰坦 最大化的最后一项技能e

符文

启迪冰川增幅海克斯科技闪现罗网小兵去质器星界洞悉
坚决骸骨镀层坚定
Ability HasteArmorHealth Scaling
深海泰坦's passive ability p
深海泰坦's q ability q
深海泰坦's w ability w
深海泰坦's e ability e
深海泰坦's ultimate ability r
1
Q
2
W
3
E
4
Q
5
Q
6
R
7
Q
8
W
9
Q
10
W
11
R
12
W
13
W
14
E
15
E
16
R

Guide to Countering 时光守护者 as 深海泰坦

Tips for Playing as 深海泰坦 against 时光守护者

- 在抓人的时候,可以用【Q疏通航道】来瞄准附近的地形,接着使用【E暗流涌动】,以获取更高的命中率。

- 【E暗流涌动】生效比较慢——你可以利用这点在逃命的同时给敌人来个下马威。

Advice to Win Against 时光守护者

- 基兰很容易死在集火之下,但是很难被单杀。想杀他时,请你的队伍集中火力。

- 如果你能跟上基兰的速度,你可以等到他的终极技能效果消逝之后,再发出夺命一击。

深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者 Counter Stats

深海泰坦 Image
winRate
47.3 %
VS
winRate
52.7 %
时光守护者 Image
2.1
< kills >
2.6
6.2
< deaths >
5.2
12.5
< assists >
13.8
0.38
< killingSprees >
0.54
35
< cs >
58
0.05
< dragons >
0.04
0.42
< inhibitors >
0.52
2,812
< physicalDamage >
1,100
6,094
< magicDamage >
10,600
920
< trueDamage >
724
9,826
< damageDealt >
12,425
22,222
< damageTaken >
18,025
8,490
< goldEarned >
9,064
1.5
< towers >
2.07
0.01
< barons >
0.01
2,365
< heal >
6,716
10,458
< xp >
11,949
54
< visionScore >
51
23
< wardsPlaced >
22
462
< ccTime >
185

How to Counter 时光守护者 with 深海泰坦 in LoL

The stat comparisons shown on this page underscore some vital 深海泰坦 against 时光守护者 matchup statistics that may help you distinguish the distinctions between the pair. For instance, 深海泰坦’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is greater than 时光守护者’s ratio of NaN, indicating that 深海泰坦 may be more central to his team's team fighting potential than 时光守护者..

深海泰坦 often has a similar longest killing spree as his opponent does. Typically, he takes more damage than 时光守护者. This often reflects different amounts of tankyness, but it can also hint that the champion with higher health has less mobility and thus is unable to flee from further harm when engaged or poked.

championDifferences.title

伤害数据

深海泰坦
时光守护者
物理伤害
魔法伤害
真实伤害

championDifferences.playStyle.title

深海泰坦
时光守护者

championDifferences.whoIsBetter

Both League champs are great champions. Both champs have their pros and cons. In the game's current meta, 深海泰坦 usually loses when facing off against 时光守护者, with a 47.3% win rate. Thus, 深海泰坦 makes a bad counter for 时光守护者.

While 深海泰坦 does have a lower win rate compared to 时光守护者, when facing one another, 深海泰坦 also has a greater difficulty level that makes him a more complex character to pick up and master. You should be very concerned when picking 深海泰坦 into 时光守护者.

Furthermore, 深海泰坦 also has a good amount of CC and other utility, a similar amount to 时光守护者. This often makes her just as valuable during team fights, especially when facing champions with a ton of burst damage.

While there isn't one best champion for every situation in League of Legends, in 深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者 matchups, 时光守护者 is the better champion with a lower win rate, similar champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allies during late stage team fights.

深海泰坦 is a bad counter to 时光守护者. Make sure you focus your strategy on maximizing your gold and cs and clearing objectives. If you do that, you should do very well as 深海泰坦 against 时光守护者.

additionalInformation.title

method.title2

method.text2

additionalInformation.resources

additionalInformation.readMore

If you would like to truly master 深海泰坦 to counter 时光守护者 during both the laning and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to pick up a few extra tips and tricks for this matchup. If you mind the build and suggestions shown above, you will increase your win rate significantly and be closer to League of Legends pro players.

深海泰坦 most often gets less CS as 时光守护者. Champions who on average don't earn much CS often don't require much CS to be valuable teammates, such as support champions. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling well off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champs with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, usually require a lot of items to be effective. In either situation, try to surpass the numbers reported here to do well.

The top items to have in your 深海泰坦 versus 时光守护者 build include 基克的聚合, 钢铁烈阳之匣, and 星界据守. When 深海泰坦 included at least these three items in his build, he performed much better versus 时光守护者 than with most other common counter builds. In fact, 深海泰坦 boasted an average win rate of 47.3% battling 时光守护者 with this build.

To have the greatest chance of coming out on top against 时光守护者 as 深海泰坦, 深海泰坦 players should take the 冰川增幅, 海克斯科技闪现罗网, 小兵去质器, 星界洞悉, 骸骨镀层, and 坚定 runes from the 启迪 and 坚决 rune sets. Of all the rune combinations that we analyzed for 深海泰坦 vs 时光守护者 counter picks, this order of runes yielded the highest win rate. Moreover, these runes gave a 47.3% winrate overall.

If you want to see 深海泰坦 versus 时光守护者 tips and counter builds for a a particular division rank, feel free to select one from the selection menu provided above. At first, the stats and guides given are computed using all rounds played with both champions.