생물 분해 광선을 사용할 때는 이 스킬을 끊을 수 있는 스킬을 가진 챔피언이 많으므로 매우 주의하셔야 합니다.
플라즈마 분열을 대각선으로 발사해 최대 사거리에서 갈라지게 하면 최초 투사체의 사거리 밖에 있는 적을 맞힐 수 있습니다. 대신 후퇴하기는 더 까다롭습니다.
공격로 대치 단계에서 공허 균열을 사용하면 미니언을 처치하면서 적 챔피언에게 유기물 분해 중첩까지 쌓을 수 있습니다. 그 다음 다른 스킬을 연계하세요.
물의 감옥은 강력한 스킬이지만 재사용 대기시간도 깁니다. 이 점을 이용해서 물의 감옥 스킬을 사용할 수 없을 때를 노리세요.
해일은 사거리가 길지만 천천히 발사되므로, 잘 살피면 피할 수 있습니다.
파도 소환사의 축복을 받은 적과는 싸움을 피하세요. 지속시간이 짧기 때문에 조금만 기다리면 유리해집니다.
The stat comparisons provided here highlight several significant 벨코즈 against 나미 counter stats that may help us distinguish the differences and similarities between the two. As an example, 벨코즈’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is more than 나미’s ratio of NaN, showing that 벨코즈 may be more central to his team's team fighting effectiveness than 나미. This observation is largely a result of the difference in kills.
벨코즈 usually has a much larger longest kill spree than his matchup does. Commonly, he receives a similar amount of damage to 나미. This often reflects different amounts of tankyness, but it can also illustrate that the one champion has less agility and thus is unable to flee from further harm when poked or engaged.
Both LoL champs are great champions. Both have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In the game's current meta, 벨코즈 usually fairs equally well when facing off against 나미, with a 50.7% win rate. Therefore, 벨코즈 makes an ok counter to 나미.
While 벨코즈 does have a higher win rate than 나미, when facing one another, 벨코즈 also has a much greater learning curve that makes him a more difficult character to learn and master. You still need to be cautious when picking 벨코즈 into 나미as his relative depth means you may not be able to reach his full potential without a lot of practice beforehand.
Moreover, 벨코즈 has some amount of CC and other utility, a similar amount to 나미. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when trying to counter champions with a lot of burst damage.
While there isn't a single best champion for every situation in League of Legends, in 벨코즈 vs 나미 matchups, 벨코즈 is the better champion with a similar win rate, more champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your allies during team fights.
벨코즈 is a decent counter to 나미. You will do well by focussing your play on maximizing your gold and cs and destroying objectives. If you are able to do that, you should hold your own as 벨코즈 against 나미.
If you would like to truly master 벨코즈 in order to counter 나미 during both the lane and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to learn a few extra tips and tricks for this matchup. If you mind the build and suggestions shown above, you will increase your win rate by a lot and be that much closer to League of Legends pro players.
벨코즈 on average accumulates much more CS compared to 나미. Champions who typically don't earn many minion kills often don't need much CS to be effective, such as sup champs. They are able to scale properly off of their skills, stats, and first items alone. Yet, champs with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, usually require many items to be effective. In either case, try to exceed the numbers displayed on this page to do well.
The best items to focus on in your 벨코즈 versus 나미 build consist of 자자크의 세계가시, 그림자불꽃, and 폭풍 쇄도. When 벨코즈 incorporated at least these three items in his build, he performed significantly better countering 나미 than with many other common builds. In fact, 벨코즈 boasted an average winrate of 50.7% when playing against 나미 with this counter build.
To have the highest probability of vanquishing 나미 as 벨코즈, you should use the 신비로운 유성, 마나순환 팔찌, 깨달음, 주문 작열, 비스킷 배달, and 우주적 통찰력 runes from the 마법 and 영감 rune sets. Out of all the rune builds we have analyed for 벨코즈 vs 나미 matchups, this composite of runes yielded the highest win rate. In fact, these runes gave a 50.7% win rate overall.
By default, tips, stats, and builds on how to beat 나미 as 벨코즈 are displayed for all skill levels, merged. To filter the stats and builds to an individual skill level, you can use the selection menu earlier in the counter matchup guide.