The stat comparisons provided here emphasize several important Renata Glasc vs. Akshan counter stats that may help you realize the distinctions between the two. Renata Glasc’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is greater than Akshan’s ratio of NaN, demonstrating that Renata Glasc may be more central to their team's team fighting effectiveness than Akshan. This observation is largely a result of the differences in assists.
Renata Glasc often has a significantly smaller longest killing spree than their counter does. On average, they takes a similar amount of damage to Akshan. This often reflects different amounts of tankyness, but it can also indicate that the champion with higher health has less agility and thus is unable to flee from additional harm when engaged or poked.
Both League of Legends champs are great. Both champs have their strengths, weaknesses, and counters. In the game's current meta, Renata Glasc usually wins when playing against Akshan, with a 51.4% win rate. Therefore, Renata Glasc makes a good counter for Akshan.
While Renata Glasc does have a higher winrate compared to Akshan, when on opposite teams, Renata Glasc also has a much greater difficulty level that makes them a more time consuming champ to pick up and master. You still need to be cautious when picking Renata Glasc into Akshanas their relative depth means that you may not be able to unleash their full potential without a significant amount of practice beforehand.
Additionally, Renata Glasc also has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to Akshan. This makes her just as valuable during teamfights, especially when facing champions with a ton of burst damage.
While there is not a single best champion overall in League of Legends, in Renata Glasc vs Akshan matchups, Renata Glasc is the better champ with a higher win rate, more champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your team members during teamfights.
Renata Glasc is a decent counter for Akshan. You will do well by focussing your play on keeping up your gold and cs and destroying objectives. If you can do that, you should do very well as Renata Glasc against Akshan.
To truly master Renata Glasc in order to counter Akshan during both the lane and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should continue reading to pick up a few extra tricks and insights into this matchup. If you pay attention to the build and suggestions displayed here, you will grow your win rate significantly and be that much closer to League of Legends pro players.
Renata Glasc typically gets a lot less CS compared to Akshan. Champions who on average don't acquire much CS usualy don't require much CS to be effective, such as sup champs. These kinds of champions are able to scale properly off of their abilities and first items alone. Yet, champions with large amounts of CS, such as hyper-carries, usually need several high cost items to be effective. In either case, try to surpass the values displayed on this page to do well.
The ideal items to focus on in your Renata Glasc versus Akshan build include Shurelyas Kampfhymne, Thymiaterion, and Zaz'Zaks Weltenstachel. When Renata Glasc used at least these three items in their build, they performed much better when facing Akshan than with most other typical builds. In fact, Renata Glasc boasted an average winrate of 51.4% when countering Akshan with this counter build.
To have the greatest likelihood of annihilating Akshan as Renata Glasc, you should use the Bewahrer, Schildschlag, Knochenpanzerung, Unerschrocken, Erbarmungsloser Jäger, and Zombie-Auge runes from the Entschlossenheit and Dominanz rune sets. Out of all the rune combinations players picked for Renata Glasc vs Akshan battles, this sequence of runes resulted in the greatest win rate. In fact, these runes gave a 51.4% winrate overall.
By default, tips, statistics, and builds on how to beat Akshan as Renata Glasc are presented for all skill levels combined. If you would like to scope the statistics and builds to a particular player tier, you should use the selection menu above.