Ashe has very few defensive options, and she's a good target to gank.
Be wary of moving around the map alone if Ashe has not recently cast her Enchanted Crystal Arrow.
The stats shown here show several strategic Renata Glasc vs. Ashe matchup stats that can help us grasp the differences between the two. Renata Glasc’s KDA ratio ([kills + assists] / deaths) of NaN is better than Ashe’s ratio of NaN, indicating that Renata Glasc may be more central to their team's team fighting capacity than Ashe. This observation is in large part caused by the differences in assists.
Renata Glasc normally has a significantly smaller longest kill spree than their matchup does. On average, they receives a similar amount of damage to Ashe. This is usually reflective of different amounts of tankyness; however, it can also show that the one champ has less mobility and thus is not able to flee from additional damage when engaged or poked.
Both LoL champs are great. Both have their pros and cons. In League's current meta, Renata Glasc usually wins when playing against Ashe, with a 52.8% win rate. As a result, Renata Glasc makes a good counter to Ashe.
While Renata Glasc does have a higher winrate than Ashe, when on opposite teams, Renata Glasc also has a much greater learning curve that makes them a more complex character to learn. You don't need to be too worried when picking Renata Glasc into Asheas their relative depth means you may not be able to unleash their full potential without a significant amount of practice beforehand.
Furthermore, Renata Glasc also has some amount of utility and CC, a similar amount to Ashe. This often makes her just as valuable during team fights, especially when facing champions with a lot of burst damage.
While there isn't a single best champion in League of Legends, in Renata Glasc vs Ashe matchups, Renata Glasc is the better champ with a noticably higher win rate, more champion depth, and a similar amount of utility to help out your team members during late stage team fights.
Renata Glasc is a good counter for Ashe. Focus your tactics on maximizing your gold and cs and taking out objectives. If you can do that, you should hold your own as Renata Glasc against Ashe.
If you would like to learn all of the intricacies of Renata Glasc to counter Ashe during both the early game and mid / late game phases of League of Legends, you should keep reading to pick up a few extra lessons on this matchup. If you pay attention to the build and suggestions presented here, you will grow your win rate by a lot and be closer to League of Legends pro players.
Renata Glasc typically accumulates a lot less CS relative to Ashe. Champions who typically don't acquire much CS typically don't have to have much CS to be valuable teammates, such as support champions. These kinds of champions are capable of scaling properly off of their abilities and first items alone. Yet, champs with a lot of CS, such as hyper-carries, typically require many items to be effective. In either situation, try to surpass the numbers displayed here to do well.
The most important items to have in your Renata Glasc versus Ashe build consist of Redemption, Locket of the Iron Solari, and Ardent Censer. When Renata Glasc bought at least these three items in their build, they performed a lot better when fighting Ashe than with most other common builds. In fact, Renata Glasc had an average win rate of 52.8% battling Ashe with this build.
To have the greatest chance of beating Ashe as Renata Glasc, you should equip the Guardian, Shield Bash, Bone Plating, Unflinching, Zombie Ward, and Relentless Hunter runes from the Resolve and Domination rune sets. Out of all the rune combinations players used for Renata Glasc vs Ashe battles, this order of runes resulted in the greatest win rate. Moreover, these runes averaged a 52.8% win rate overall.
By default, tips, statistics, and builds on how to beat Ashe as Renata Glasc are given for all skill levels combined. If you would like to scope the statistics and builds to a specific player tier, you can use the selection menu earlier on the page.